“With movements so swift they seemed simultaneous, Atticus’s hand yanked a balltipped lever as he brought the gun to his shoulder. Think about how this event indirectly characterizes Atticus.
In this example, Atticus Finch kills a rabid dog named Tim Johnson. Here’s a great example of indirect characterization from Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. But although indirect characterization is defined by the tenet “show, don’t tell,” it’s still used in literature to show who a character is rather than to tell us about them. What is the difference between direct and indirect characterization? Well, direct characterization is telling, not showing whereas indirect characterization is showing, not telling. We’ll get into how this type of characterization leads to character depth in a bit, but first let’s break down the indirect characterization definition.ĭirect vs Indirect Characterization Indirect characterization examples As such, it's an integral facet of round characters. Indirect characterization is an important part of developing multi-dimensional characters. Here’s an example of a round character:ĭon Draper from Mad Men is a good example of a round character because he’s emotionally complex, subject to change, and frequently indirectly characterized. They’re usually dynamic (changing) and often indirectly characterized. Round characters are complex multi-dimensional characters. Here’s an example of a flat character:Ĭhewbacca from Star Wars is a good example of a flat character because he’s incredibly simple, doesn’t change, and rarely indirectly characterized. They’re often static (unchanging) and rarely indirectly characterized.
round charactersīefore we dive into our indirect characterization definition, let’s quickly go over the difference between flat and round characters. The characterization required for each of these character types varies quite a bit.įlat characters are simple, one-dimensional characters. Define Indirect Characterization With Subtypes Primer on flat vs.
0 kommentar(er)
